|
Article
Morphotypes dentaires actuels et fossiles des chiroptères vespertilionines. 2ème partie: implications systématique et phylogéniques.
Published online: 15/11/1987
Keywords:
Chiroptera; PHYLOGENY; Systematics; Vespertilionine
https://doi.org/10.18563/pv.17.3.77-150
References: 94
Cite this article:
Henri Menu, 1987. Morphotypes dentaires actuels et fossiles des chiroptères vespertilionines. 2ème partie: implications systématique et phylogéniques. PalaeoVertebrata 17 (3): 77-150. doi: 10.18563/pv.17.3.77-150
Export citation
Abstract
The first part of this study was devoted to a descriptive analysis of teeth morphologies among the vespertilionine bats. This leads now to a tentative synthesis, providing views on the systematics of the group. The results could be seen according to three distinct but closely related purposes : 1 - the sorting of the genera contents in order to conform the genera units to homogeneous taxa that could represent natural issues of evolutionary lineages ; 2 - the investigation of relationships between extant genera in order to infer the possibilities of common origin ; 3 - according to the preceeding items and to the observed evolutionary trends, a tentative phylogeny, modest and cautious. The contents of many genera are sorted : Leuconoe is removed from subgeneric to generic position, whereas Myotis becomes a subgenus of it ; the myotodont species are cleared away from the Pipistrellus genus ; Glischropus and Scotozous are synonymized within Pipistrellus ; Hypsugo is raised to the generic level ; some species previously ranged within Pipistrellus will form provisionally a collective group, Attalepharca nov. ; the Eptesicus genus is broken up, the excluded species being grouped within Nycterikaupius gen. nov. ; the Nycticeini tribe is defined again after exclusion of Otonycteris , Scotoecus, Scotophilus , and addition of Hesperoptenus ; the species la io and Pipistrellus tasmaniensis are removed to Eptesicus (n.s.) and Pipistrellus dormeri to Scotoecus. Groupings of genera are stated according to the main evolutionary trends of I1/. The relevance of these is often warranted by close morphologic similarities of other teeth. This leads to a recognition of the major evolutionary radiations which occurred in the group. The filiations schematized at the end of the work show the dental relationships observed between the extant genera, and could represent a phylogenic framework. Two major facts are to be underlined : 1- the early divergence of leuconoids ; 2 - the successives crossings to myotodonty from the nyctaloid flow. Fossil data from the literature are punctually and tentatively incorporated within phylogenic sketches.
Published in Vol. 17, Fasc. 3 (1987)
References
ALLEN G.M., 1939. — Checklist of African mammals. Bull. Mus. comp. Zool. Harv., 83 : 1-763.
ALLEN H., 1864. — Monograph of the bats of North America. Smithsonian Washington Misc. Coll., 7 (24) : 85 p., 68 fig.
ALLEN H., 1865. — On a new genus of Vespertilionidae. Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Philadelphia, 17 (4) : 173-175.
ALLEN H., 1866. — Notes on the Vespertilionidae of tropical America. Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Philadelphia : 279-288.
ALLEN H., 1893. — A monograph of the bats of North America. Smithsonian Inst. Bull. Unit. St. Nat. Mus., (43) : 1-140, 40 fig., 3 pl. https://doi.org/10.5479/si.03629236.43.i
ANDERSEN K., 1908. — On four little known names of chiropteran genera. Ann. Mag. nat. Hist., (8) 1 : 434. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222930808692427
BAUD F.J., 1979. — Myotis aelleni, nov. sp., chauve-souris nouvelle d'Argentine (Chiroptera : Vespertilionidae). Rev. suisse zool., 86 (1) : 267-278, 4 fig. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.part.82292
BAUDELOT S., 1972. — Étude des chiroptères, insectivores et rongeurs du Miocène de Sansan (Gers). Thèse n° 496, Univ. P. Sabatier, Toulouse, 364 p. + I-XVI, 89 fig., 16 pl.
BIANCHI V., 1916. — Notes préliminaires sur les chauves-souris ou Chiroptères du Gouvernement de Petrograd. Ann. Mus. Zool. Acad. Sci. Petrograd, 21 : LXXVIII.
BOIE F., 1830. — Naturgeschichtliche Beiträge II Leuconoe BOIE - Eine neue Fledermausgattung. Isis von Oken, (3) : 256-257.
BONAPARTE C.L., 1837. — Iconographia della Fauna Italia. 1 Mammiferi. Tip. Salviucci, Roma.
BOWDICH T.E., 1825. — Excursions in Madeira and Porto Santo. F.G. Levrault Edit., Paris : 36.
BROSSET A., 1966. — La biologie des chiroptères. Masson et Cie, Editeurs, Paris : 240 p., 77 fig.
CONISBEE L.R., 1953. — Genera and subgenera of Recent Mammals. British Museum (Nat. Hist.), London : 109 p.
CUVIER F., 1832. — Essai de classification naturelle des Vespertilions et description de plusieurs espèces de ce genre. Nouv. Ann. Mus. Hist. Nat., 1 : 1-20.
DOBSON G.E., 1875. — On the genus Scotophilus, with description of a new genus and species allied thereto. Proc. Zool. Soc. London : 372.
DOBSON G.E., 1878. — Catalogue of the Chiroptera in the Collection of the British Museum (Natural History), London : 567 p., 30 pl.
ENGESSER B., 1972. — Die obermiozäne Säugetierfauna von Anwil (Baselland). Tätigk. Naturf. Gesel. Basel, 28 : 1-363, 134 fig.
GAILLARD C., 1899. — Mammifères nouveaux ou peu connus de La Grive-Saint-Alban (Isère). Arch. Mus. Hist. nat. Lyon, 7 (2) : 1-79, 32 fig., 3 pl. https://doi.org/10.3406/mhnly.1899.957
GERVAIS P., 1855. — Documents zoologiques pour servir à la monographie des Cheiroptères sud-américains. In CASTELNAU F. de, Mammifères - Animaux nouveaux ou rares recueillis pendant l'expédition dans les parties centrales de l'Amérique du Sud, 7, I Zool., Paris : 25-88, pl. VII-XV.
GRAY J.E., 1831. — Descriptions of some new genera and species of Bats. Zool. Miscell. : 37-38.
GRAY J.E., 1841. — Contributions towards the geographical distribution of the Mammalia of Australia, with notes on some recently discovered species. In GRAY, Journals of two expeditions of discovery in North-West and Western Australia, 2 : 406.
HANDLEY C.O., 1959. — A revision of American bats of the genera Euderma and Plecotus. Proc. Unit. St. Nat. Mus., 110 (3417) : 95-246, 27 fig. https://doi.org/10.5479/si.00963801.110-3417.95
HELLER K.G. et VOLLETH M., 1984. — Taxonomic position of Pipistrellus societatis HILL, 1972, and karyological characteristics of the genus Eptesicus (Chiroptera: Vespertilionidae). Z. f. zool. Syst. u. Evol., 22 (1) : 65-77, 5 fig. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0469.1984.tb00563.x
HIBBARD C.W., 1950. — Mammals of the Rexroad Formation from Fox Canyon, Meade County, Kansas. Contrib. Mus. Paleontol. Univ. Mich., 8 : 113-192.
HIBBARD C.W., 1960. — Two late Pleistocene faunas from Southwestern Kansas. In HIBBARD C.W. et TAYLOR D.W., Contrib. Mus. Paleontol. Univ. Mich., 16 : 1-223.
HILL J.E., 1974. — A review of Scotoecus THOMAS, 1901 (Chiroptera: Vespertilionidae). Bull. Brit. Mus. (Nat. Hist.), Zool., 27 (4) : 167-188, 4 fig.
HILL J.E., 1976. — Bats referred to Hesperoptenus PETERS, 1869 (Chiroptera: Vespertilionidae) with the description of a new subgenus. Bull. Brit. Mus. (Nat. Hist.), Zool., 30 (1) : 1-28, 5 fig., 4 pl. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.part.2372
HORÁČEK I. et HANAK V., 1986. — Generic status of Pipistrellus savii and comments on classification of the genus Pipistrellus (Chiroptera, Vespertilionidae). Myotis, 1986, (23-24) : 9-16.
IRELADE T. et TROUGHTON E.G., 1934. — Check-list of the mammals recorded from Australia. Mem. Aus. Mus., 6 : 1-122. https://doi.org/10.3853/j.0067-1967.6.1934.516
JENTINK F.A., 1888. — Catalogue systématique des Mammifères. Mus. Hist. Nat. Pays-Bas, Leiden, XII.
JENTINK F.A., 1890. — Mammalia from the Malay Archipelago. II Rodentia, Insectivora, Chiroptera. In Zoologische ergebnisse einer reise in Niederländisch Ost-Indien (herausgegeben Dr. Max Weber). Leiden, E.J. Brill Ed., (1) : 129-130. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004596986_008
JENTINK F.A., 1910. — Chrysopteron bartelsii, novum genus and nova species, from Java. Notes from the Leyden Museum, 32 : 73.
KAUP J., 1829. — Entwicklungsgeschichte und natürliches System der Europäischen Thierwelt. In Commission bei Carl Wilhelm Leske, Darmstadt und Leipzig, 1 : 98.
KEYSERLING A. und BLASIUS I.H., 1839. — Übersicht der gattungs und Artcharactere der europäischer Fledermäuse. Arch. Naturg. Berlin, 5 (1) : 293-331.
KOLENATI F., 1858. — Eine neue österreichische Fledermaus. Sitzb. Akad. Wiss. Wien, 29 (9) : 250-256.
KOOPMAN K.F., 1970. — A second locality for Eudiscopus denticulus (Chiroptera: Vespertilionidae). Jour. Mamm., 51 : 191. https://doi.org/10.2307/1378563
KOOPMAN K.F., 1971. — Taxonomic notes on Chalinolobus and Glauconycteris (Chiroptera: Vespertilionidae). Am. Mus. Novitates, 2451 : 1-10, 1 fig.
KOOPMAN K.F., 1972. — Eudiscopus denticulus. Mammalian Species, 19 : 1-2, 3 fig. https://doi.org/10.2307/3504053
KOOPMAN K.F., 1978. — The genus Nycticeius (Vespertilionidae), with special reference to tropical Australia. Proc. of the fourth international bat research conference, Kenya Nat. Ac. for advancement of arts and sciences, 3 : 165-171, 1 fig.
KOOPMAN K.F., 1984. — A synopsis of the Families of Bats. (7). Bat Research News, 25 (3/4) : 25-27.
KOWALSKI K., 1956. — Insectivores, Bats and Rodents from the Early Pleistocene bone breccia of Podlesice near Kroczyce (Poland). Acta Palaeontologica Polonica, 1 (4) : 361-376, 4 pl.
KUZJAKIN A.P., 1944. — Mammals of USSR. In BOBRINSKOY N.A., KUZNETZOV B. et KUZJAKIN A. (Eds.), Soviets Kaya Nauka, Moscow, 4 tomes : 440 p., 256 fig., 32 pl., 62 cartes.
KUZJAKIN A.P., 1950. — Letucije mysi. Soviets Kaya Nauka, Moskva.
LANZA B., 1959. — Fauna d'Italia, Mammalia, Insectivora, Chiroptera. In TOSCHI A. e LANZA B. (Eds.), Calderini, Bologna : 448 p., 164 fig.
LAURENT P., 1936. — Une forme saharienne du genre Plecotus: P. auritus saharae subsp. nov. Bull. Soc. Hist. nat. Afrique du Nord, 27 : 408-412, 2 fig., 1 pl. https://doi.org/10.1515/mamm.1937.1.3.111
LEACH W.E., 1821. — The characters of three new genera of bats without foliaceous appendages to the nose. Trans. Linn. Soc. London, 13 : 69-72. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8339.1821.tb00055.x
LEGENDRE S., 1984. — Étude odontologique des représentants actuels du groupe Tadarida (Chiroptera, Molossidae). Implications phylogéniques, systématiques et zoogéographiques. Rev. Suisse Ecol., Genève, 91 (2) : 399-442, 18 fig., 1 pl. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.part.81886
MAISONNEUVE P., 1878. — Traité de l'ostéologie et de la myologie du Vespertilio murinus. O. Doin Editeur, Paris.
MARTIN R.A., 1972. — Synopsis of Late Pliocene and Pleistocene Bats of North America and the Antilles. Am. Midland Nat., Univ. Notre Dame Press, Indiana, 87 (2) : 326-335. https://doi.org/10.2307/2423565
MENU H., 1984. — Révision du statut de Pipistrellus subflavus (F. CUVIER, 1832). Proposition d'un taxon générique nouveau: Perimyotis nov. gen. Mammalia, 48 (3) : 409-416. https://doi.org/10.1515/mamm.1984.48.3.409
MENU H., 1985. — Morphotypes dentaires actuels et fossiles des Chiroptères Vespertilioninés. 1ère Partie: Étude des morphologies dentaires. Palaeovertebrata, 15 (2) : 71-128, 43 fig. https://doi.org/10.18563/pv.15.2.71-128
MEIN P. et TUPINIER Y., 1977. — Formule dentaire et position systématique du minioptère (Mammalia, Chiroptera). Mammalia, 41 (2) : 207-211, 2 fig. https://doi.org/10.1515/mamm.1977.41.2.207
MILLER G.S., 1897. — Revision of the North American bats of the family Vespertilionidae. North American Fauna, Gov. Print. Off. Washington, 13 : 141 p., 40 fig., 3 pl. https://doi.org/10.3996/nafa.13.0001
MILLER G.S., 1906. — Twelve new genera of bats. Proc. Biol. Soc. Washington, 19 : 83-86.
MILLER G.S., 1907. — The families and genera of bats. Smithsonian Inst., Unit. St. Nat. Mus., 57 : 282 p., 49 fig., 14 pl. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.55695
MILLER G.S. et ALLEN G.M., 1928. — The American bats of the genera Myotis and Pizonyx. Smithsonian Inst., Unit. St. Nat. Mus. Bull., 144 : 218 p., 1 fig., 13 cartes. https://doi.org/10.5479/si.03629236.144.i
OGNEV S.I., 1927. — A synopsis of the Russian Bats. Jour. Mamm., 8 : 140-157. https://doi.org/10.2307/1373648
OSGOOD W.H., 1932. — Mammals of the Kelley-Roosevelts and Delacourt Asiatic expeditions. Field Mus. Nat. Hist. Chicago Publ., 312, Zool. ser. 28 (10) : 193-339, 1 carte.
PEN H.S., KAO Y.T., LU C.K., FENG T.C. et CHEN C.H., 1962. — Report on mammals Southwestern Szechwan and Northwestern Yunnan. Acta Zool. Sinica, 14, Suppl. : 105-132.
PETERS W., 1865. — Hr. W. Peters las über einige weniger bekannte Flederthiere (Phyllostoma brachyotum, Coelops, Furia, Lasionycteris). Monatsber. K. preuss. Akad. Wissensch. Berlin : 648.
PETERS W., 1866. — Hr. W. Peters machte eine Mittheilung über neue oder ungenügend bekannte Flederthiere (Vampyros, Uroderma, Chiroderma, Ametrida, Tylostoma, Vespertilio, Vesperugo) und Nager (Tylomys, Lasiomys). Monatsber. K. preuss. Akad. Wissensch. Berlin : 402.
PETERS W., 1866. — Hr. W. Peters legte vor: fernere mittheilungen zur Kenntniss der Flederthiere namentlich über Arten des Leidener und Britischen Museums. Monatsber. K. preuss. Akad. Wissensch. Berlin : 680.
PETERS W., 1868. — Hr. W. Peters machte eine Mittheilung über die von dem Hon. Marquis Giacomo Doria in Sarawak auf Borneo gesammelten Flederthiere. Monatsber. K. preuss. Akad. Wissensch. Berlin : 626-627.
QUINET G.E., 1965. — Myotis misonnei n. sp., Chiroptère de l'Oligocène de Hoogbutsel. Inst. Roy. Sc. Nat. de Belgique, 41 (20) : 1-11, 1 fig.
RABEDER G., 1973. — Mitteilungsblatt für Fledermauskundler. Myotis, 11 : 15-17.
RACHL R., 1983. — Die Chiroptera (Mammalia) aus den Mittelmiozänen Kalten des Nördlinger Rieses (Süddeutschland). Thèse, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München : 284 p., 80 fig.
RAFINESQUE C.S., 1819. — Prodrome-De 70 nouveaux genres d'animaux découverts dans l'intérieur des États-Unis d'Amérique, durant l'année 1818. Jour. de Physique, June 1819, 88 : 417.
REVILLIOD P., 1922. — Contribution à l'étude des Chiroptères des terrains tertiaires. 3. Mém. Soc. pal. suisse, 45 : 133-195, 24 fig., 1 pl.
ROBERTS A., 1919. — Descriptions of some new mammals. Am. transv. Mus., 6 : 112.
ROSEVEAR D.R., 1965. — The bats of West Africa. British Museum (Natural History) Ed. : 418 p.
RYAN R.M., 1966. — A new some imperfectly known Australian Chalinolobus and the taxonomic status of African Glauconycteris. Jour. Mamm., 47 (1) : 86-91. https://doi.org/10.2307/1378072
SIGÉ B., 1974. — Données nouvelles sur le genre Siehlinia (Vespertilionoidea, Chiroptera) du Paléogène d'Europe. Palaeovertebrata, 6 : 253-272, 5 fig. https://doi.org/10.18563/pv.6.3-4.253-272
SIMPSON G.G., 1945. — The principles of classification and a classification of mammals. Bull. Am. Mus. nat. Hist., 85 : 350 p.
SINHA Y.P. et CHAKRABORTY S., 1971. — Taxonomic status of the vespertilionid bat, Nycticejus emarginatus DOBSON. Proc. Zool. Soc. Calcutta, 24 : 53-59, 3 fig., 1 tab.
SODY G.J.V., 1937. — Notes on some mammals from Sumatra, Java, Bali, Buru and New Guinea. Temminckia, 2.
STIRTON R.A., 1931. — A new genus of the family Vespertilionidae from San Pedro Pliocene of Arizona. Univ. Cal. Pub. in Geological Sciences, 20 : 27-30, 2 fig.
STRICKLER T.L., 1978. — Functional osteology and myology of the shoulder in the chiroptera. Contrib. Vertebrate Evol., 4 : I-IV, 1-198, 55 fig. https://doi.org/10.1159/isbn.978-3-8055-2699-9
TATE G.H.H., 1941. — Results of the Archbold expeditions, n° 39. A review of the genus Myotis (Chiroptera) of Eurasia, with special reference to species occurring in the East Indies. Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist., 78 : 537-765.
TATE G.H.H., 1941. — Results of the Archbold expeditions, n° 40. Notes on vespertilionid bats of the subfamilies Miniopterinae, Murinae, Kerivoulinae and Nyctophilinae. Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist., 78 : 567-597, 4 fig.
TATE G.H.H., 1942. — Results of the Archbold expeditions, n° 47. Review of the vespertilionine bats. Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist., 80 : 221-297, 5 fig.
THOMAS O., 1900. — List of the mammals obtained by Dr. G. Franco Grillo in the province of Parana, Brazil. Ann. Mus. Civ. di Stor. Nat., 20 : 546.
THOMAS O., 1902. — On two new mammals from China. Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., 10 (7) : 163-166. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222930208678653
THOMAS O., 1904. — A new bat from the United States, representing the European Myotis (Leuconoe) daubentoni. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist., 7 (13) : 382. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222930408562461
THOMAS O., 1915. — Scientific results from the Mammal Survey n° 10(A). The Indian bats assigned to genus Myotis. Jour. Bombay Nat. Hist. Soc., 23 (4) : 607-612.
THOMAS O., 1923. — On some small mammals, chiefly Bats, from the East Indian Archipelago. Ann. Mag. nat. Hist., 11 (ser. 9) : 250-255. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222932308632849
TOMES R.F., 1859. — Description of six hitherto undescribed species of bats. Proc. Zool. Soc. London : 70.
TOPAL G., 1970. — The first record of Ia io THOMAS, 1902 in Vietnam and India, and some remarks on the taxonomic position of Parascotomanes beaulieui BOURRET, 1942, Ia longimana PEN, 1962, and the genus Ia THOMAS, 1902 (Chiroptera : Vespertilionidae). Opus. Zool. Budapest, X, 2 : 341-347, 2 fig., 2 tab.
TORRE L. de la & DYSART M.P., 1966. — A method for photographing teeth of small mammals. J. Mammalogy, 47 (3) : 515-518, 3 fig. https://doi.org/10.2307/1377694
TROUGHTON E. LE G., 1929. — A new genus and species of bats (Kerivoulinae) from the Solomons, with a review of the genera of the subfamily. Rec. Austr. Mus. Sydney, 17 : 85-99. https://doi.org/10.3853/j.0067-1975.17.1929.756
VIRET J., 1951. — Catalogue critique de la faune de mammifères miocènes de La Grive-Saint-Alban. (1) Chiroptera, Carnivores, Edentés, Pholidotes. Nv. Arch. Mus. Hist. nat. Lyon, 3 : 104 p., 23 fig., 4 pl. https://doi.org/10.3406/mhnly.1951.985
WAGNER J.A., 1855. — Die Säugethiere in Abbildungen nach der Natur, mit Beschreibungen. (of J.C.v. SCHREBER), suppl. 5, 26 : 810 p.
WALLIN L., 1969. — The Japanese bat fauna. A comparative study of chorology, species diversity and ecological differentiation. Zool. Bidrag Fran Uppsala, 37 (3-4) : 223-440, 84 fig.
ZAPFE H., 1950. — Die Fauna der miozänen Spaltenfüllung von Neudorf an der March (CSR). Chiroptera. Sitz. Ber. Oesterr. Akad. math. naturw. Kl., Wien, 154 : 51-64, 9 fig.
|
PDF
|
